1.15.2008

Capitalist activism?

So, we've spent the last two days in Post class debating economics, environmental issues, social change and activism. Which sounds like my cup of tea, except I keep leaving class wanting to kill someone. Because, these, essentially were the debates:

Day 1 : Environmental Justice

Issue: Are there always losers in a capitalist system and can you make progress in areas like this without destroying capitalism?

Sides:

Victor Lindstrom--You can't change things like high pollution areas without getting rid of capitalism, therefore you shouldn't try.

Darren Veit and others--You can't change without getting rid of capitalism, therefore we should get rid of capitalism because it's inherently racist and classist.

Me and nobody else--Capitalism and environmental/social justice aren't incompatible, you just need small amounts of regulation and government action which gives market incentives for positive change.


Day 2: Social Entrepreneurship

Issue: Can you make money without exploiting someone?

Sides

Darren--No, it's completely impossible, especially in the US because it's ingrained in our economic and political system.

Me--Yes--trade isn't a zero-sum game. You having a dollar means someone else has a dollar less, but that's not a bad thing all the time. If I sell you something for a dollar that you're willing to buy for a dollar, everyone wins. I get a dollar richer. You get a dollar of value. And this isn't just theory--Grameen Bank, case in point. It's an incredibly profitable business, and it benefits the poor who get microloans. Even Cranium. Who does that exploit? I'm not going to say it does no harm to anybody, and especially not the environment, but that's different than exploitation.

I'm so sick of feeling like the only activist who doesn't hate capitalism. Yes, it has its problems, but find me a better system. And people like Ms. Engstrom, who get mad about the fact that we're looking for alternative fuel technologies for cars, when we should all just stop driving in the first place..I'm sorry, but we as a society can't function that way. Progress doesn't have to be a bad thing. And while you might be ok with that, most people wouldn't be, and you can't force people to live a certain way.

And it occurs to me now that I'm conflicted about so many things, everyday. I have so many things fighting inside of me, so many different opinions about every single little thing in the world. Let me show you what I mean:

I have a deep respect for our women and men in uniform, and I believe that they are incredibly brave and loyal people. I think war is necessary sometimes. But I hate our military-minded complex, I hate that we fight other cultures first and negotiate later, and I hate the wars those brave soldiers have been involved in in the last few decades.

I believe everyone should have opportunity to advance and that companies should pay people living wages. I know that most people are poor through bad luck or birth, not because of laziness. But I also think companies have a right to hire people at market prices--what people are willing to work for, be it in third world sweatshops or here within our borders. After all, a sweatshop job is better than no job, as horrible as that sounds.

I love the earth and I would rather die than live in a world without mountains, trees, animals and functional ecosystems (and I'm pretty sure that's not an exaggeration for dramatic effect). I believe we all, collectively need to wake up and start reducing our consumption, building sustainable communities and taking care of the earth. But I don't think you can force businesses to be more green. You can't shut down the cattle industry, even if it is responsible for 25% of the world's carbon emissions. You can't make ExxonMobile stop spending billions of dollars to convince people that climate change isn't real. And you can't say that the better information will win, because the people with the money aren't usually the green ones, and it hasn't been working.

How can I change the world when I can't convince my own father to keep our thermostat below 70 degrees? How can I justify asking other people to change their lives when I live in the house I do, wear the clothes I wear, buy the things I buy? How can I, believing so much in the value of competition, the human spirit, the beauty of innovation, how can I tell somebody that their idea, their business, their profit-making method is not valid because the cost is too high to society?

To those of you who ask--how can you spend so much time thinking about these things, my only response is--how can you not? I've never known another way to think, to look at the world. I've thought this way since 2nd grade--my knowledge and opinions have shifted, my core values have remained the same. I believe our lives have no higher mandate, no higher purpose, than to work as hard as we can for as long as we can to make the world a better place, in whatever way we see that. Some people are scientists, giving us a better understanding of the world around us and its possibilities. Some are artists, making us think and adding beauty to a world that can seem bleak. Some of us are businesspeople, coming up with new ideas and finding better ways to make them. And some of us are activists, for the same reason--because that is our calling. Because that is the only way I know to make the world better.

2 comments:

Walt said...

*Clapping*
An excelent speech Rachel. Quite good. Some interesting points. Tragedy of the Commons shows that people probably can't be convinced to take care of their world. So it comes down to a question eerily like one our forefathers faced. Do we allow others to kill all of us for their inalienable right to liberty, or do we enforce our will on all the others "for their own good", which is definitly a slippery slope? Maybe a massive culture shift could get people to make sacrifices, but that's an intrusion on liberties too.

Unknown said...

It's the entire issue of liberty - how far can you allow people to go with it. Technically, countries have a right to not have freedom. If that country hasn't signed a document saying that they will abide to international code, than don't we as freedom believing people have to respect a nations right to injustice?

And revolution - you can argue that it's necessary sometimes to enforce change, but in almost every instance revolution causes more bloodshed than good it causes. You can dedicate all of yourself to a cause but if someone isn't willing to change than you can't force them unless you are willing to go against your own morals

All you can really do is spread small amounts of change by getting people to think about it and by taking steps in that direction. All the while you have to stay positive because that much obligation can really take its toll. And yet, making little changes to an existing system can still be problematic - because as that system develops and encounters more problems it will become evident that there will still be problems unless you can create one perfect economic system, which is probably impossible. But it's better to try for the impossible than to become jaded and pessimistic, to withdraw from society, your ideas placed in solitude, hidden away forever.