Campus is relatively deserted now, and watching all my senior friends
walk across the stage at graduation has gotten me thinking about what I’ve
learned here at Whitman over the past semester. This semester in particular, my
classes and extracurriculars all interacted in a complimentary way. Weirdly,
the big idea I’ve gotten out of this hasn’t been some academic theory or new
conceptual framework for viewing the world. It’s a really simple thought—that the
stories we tell are fundamentally important for understanding, constructing and
changing society.
Right now, you’re thinking, Yeah
Rachel, duh. I know, it’s not the most original thing in the world. But
over the past four months, I’ve explored the idea of narrative and story from
enough angles that I think there’s a deeper edge to my understanding.
I only had three real classes this semester—Political Ecology,
Environmental Communication and The Nature Essay. Aside from school, most of my
free time was spent writing for the Pioneer, telling stories about campus life.
This combination created a lot of tension in my head, possibly due to the
different expectations each of these classes came with:
Political Ecology: It’s easy
to get seduced by good writing, so be careful of that and learn to deconstruct the
author’s assumptions.
Nature Essay: We’re going to
learn to seduce readers with our writing.
Environmental Communication:
We’re going to analyze stories to see what they’re really saying and how we can
use rhetorical practice to get our message across when talking about the
environment.
The Pioneer: Write stories. Don’t
be biased.
I definitely had a few nights where political ecology me got in the way
of writing my nature essays, because I was freaking out about accurate
representations of everything and the political implications of the words I was
using. But all in all, that synthesis has been a really good thing. It’s such a
healthy challenge to be critically interrogating language that perpetuates
systematic oppression while also trying to write lyrically for a general audience—people
who have never heard of things like hegemonic masculinity or gender dysphoria. It’s
pushed me to become a far better writer, because I have to constantly think
about the subtle implications of the way I’m portraying “reality.”
Stories, to be sure, can be insidious. When something is presented as
fictional, it’s easy to not question the social norms it’s reinforcing. And
when something is presented as “reality” or “objective journalism,” it’s easy
to not look for the biases that shape everything anybody writes. News always
involves choices—about which stories to print and not to print, about who to
talk to, about how to present the issue in question. And it doesn’t take too
many articles like the recent New York Times piece sexualizing and dehumanizing
a trans woman who died in a fire to see the ways in which the stories we tell
both reflect and shape our societal norms about how people should be treated.
With examples like that, it’s easy to get depressed about writing. But
fundamentally, episodes like this reinforce the idea that there is power in the
written word. For me, that’s a hopeful and inspiring place to be. I’ve seen
this firsthand interacting with friends in the wake of my trip to the U.S.-Mexico
border. You can argue facts and logic about immigration policy all day, and you’ll
probably get people to agree with you. But it’s in the stories—the human, the
personal, the stuff that hits close to home—where people actually listen. I’ve
spouted immigration stats to friends who didn’t care much, and then seen their
eyes open when I recount a story or show them the essay I wrote after that trip
was over. People get it so much more quickly when there’s a narrative. Ditto
with my articles about rape on the Whitman campus. I guarantee that the
dialogue we’ve had on campus about sexual assault didn’t happen because of the
statistics about how many reported sexual assaults occur every year. They
happened because some incredible women were brave enough to share their stories
with me, and those stories connected with people in a way that numbers can’t.
I’ve struggled a lot with the idea of being a writer. With the world so
screwed up in so many ways, trying to make a living stringing words together
seems silly and self-indulgent. And it is, to an extent. Writing won’t be
enough to solve the world’s problems, and I don’t want it to be my whole life.
But if I’ve learned anything this semester, it’s that those stories aren’t meaningless.
In the written word, there is both the power to define and shape reality, and
the responsibility to do it fairly, accurately. In writing, I see the seeds of
radicalism, of building something better. It’s not enough, but it’s definitely
a place to start.
No comments:
Post a Comment