After two hours of work, we’d driven stakes into the grass, put the pallets on top, and stapled cardboard to the whole thing. Our wall stretched from the library to the tennis courts, blocking off a funnel pathway for students walking to and from class.
We spray-painted the side facing the library with graffiti in a variety of languages—German, Arabic, Spanish, English—and made references to the U.S.-Mexico border, the Berlin Wall and the Israeli occupation. This side was the “occupied” side of the border, the side that traditionally has graffiti on it. I added my favorite piece of graffiti from the U.S.-Mexico border wall, though it’s since been painted over: Las parades vueltas de lado son puentes. Walls turned on their sides are bridges.
The other side was blank, except for a large proclamation: International Border. Please have documents ready.
It wasn’t a serious impediment to travel—people could easily go around
the library or through the tennis courts—but it was big enough that people had
to stop and look at it, think about how they could navigate around.
I won’t speak for the other members of the group, but I was motivated
to participate in this project because of my experiences on the U.S.-Mexico
border over spring break. Spending a week in the Arizona borderlands made it
abundantly clear to me just how much is broken about our immigration policies,
their enforcement, and the very notion of a border in the first place.
The wait to get a legal visa for Mexican nationals is currently about
twenty years if you already have a close relative living in the U.S., and the
U.S. government has yet to recognize the drug-related violence in Mexico as a
legitimate conflict, which means people threatened with death can’t apply to
get asylum. U.S. policies, including free-trade agreements like NAFTA, the
continued criminalization of drugs and the unwillingness to stop weapons from
being smuggled into Mexico, account for many of the problems pushing people
north—realities that our immigration laws largely refuse to consider.
The U.S. enforces its immigration laws through a physical border in the
Southwest, which pushes migrants into the desert, where many die of dehydration
and other injuries in the attempt to cross into the United States. Still, to
focus only on that physical border fence would be disingenuous. The U.S.-Mexico
border has worked its way into communities across the country, and the line
separating us from them is redrawn constantly in day-to-day interactions
between citizens, migrants, law enforcement, government officials and the
mixed-status families affected by immigration policy.
Border fence from Arizona, near Nogales. |
In short, U.S. border and immigration policies have combined to make
movement a privilege, something accorded based on citizenship and skin color. As
a U.S. citizen, I can enter 90 countries around the world with no visa,
including virtually every Latin American nation. If I want to walk into Nogales
for a day of shopping, I’m free to do so. Driving through the American
Southwest, I can sail through Border Patrol checkpoints without having to show
ID—my whiteness is enough to tell the uniformed men that I “belong” in this
country.
Border Patrol checkpoint near Tucson, AZ |
For me, this is the value in building a border wall on campus. Whitman
students as a group are largely privileged. Virtually all of us are U.S.
citizens, and international students are generally here with documentation and
visas. There are fewer than a dozen undocumented students on campus. For most
of us, movement is not a privilege we have to think about. Most of us will
never encounter a border that we are not legally allowed to cross. Most of us
will never have to consider the possibility of being deported.
When we first put the wall up, students reacted to it. It made crossing
the path impossible, so people were forced to interact with it. Some students
were frustrated by the boundary. I overheard several comments such as, “I don’t
get the point of this,” “This is ridiculous, it’s in a public space,” and “It’s
not fair; they’re blocking the path.” A lot of people stopped to read the
graffiti. But every single person, no matter their thoughts on the project, had
to think about it. At the very least, they had to consider their own movement—how
can I get around this wall?
I was tired after our 4a.m. construction call, so after breakfast with
the construction team, I went back to sleep from 8 to 10:30. After my nap, I
went back to look at the wall. Apparently, we’d frustrated some people enough that
they felt compelled to knock down two pallets in the middle of the wall. It was
a small gap, but it changed the wall completely. With the hole there, students
no longer had to think about their movement. Some still stopped to look at the
graffiti, but far more walked by talking with friends or texting.
If there’s one lesson I got out of this, it’s that reconceiving the
ability to move as privilege is a challenge. I think it’s important for people
to recognize the things they take for granted, and important to push people to
think about what those things are. I had a ton of fun building the wall, and I
hope that we were able to get at least a few Whitties thinking about all the
borders in the world, visible and invisible, that have much more serious
implications than just being a minute late to class.
1 comment:
Cool idea and I LOVE that quote from the wall. Its interesting for me to talk to brazilians about our immigration issues and the racism that goes along with it. I don't think it's an issue that a lot of people outside the US know about, and for brazilians going to the US it can be an issue because they can look "Mexican" receive some of the hate fueling these tensions.
Post a Comment