Showing posts with label lists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lists. Show all posts

1.08.2012

Rachel's Official Guide to Learning More About Shit Going on in the World

Quite frequently, I get people who ask me for recommended reading lists or a list of books they can read to be better informed about stuff going on in the world. After a number of friends from my study abroad program asked me to make a reading list for them so they could be more on top of politics and other news, I started thinking. While I do read a lot of nonfiction, the books I’ve read aren’t the only source of my knowledge about stuff. I spend at least as much time reading articles online, following people on Twitter and doing other things to stay informed. So rather than make a book list, I made this: Rachel’s Official Guide to Learning More About Shit Going on in the World. It’s a booklist with article links, recommendations for people to follow and stuff like that, vaguely grouped by topic, but generally sort of free form. It's based on my personal experience and is thus completely subjective, noncomprehensive and biased. Hopefully this is helpful to everyone who wants to understand where my brain picks up the information it does. Comments, questions, criticisms and additions are highly appreciated/encouraged. I will also make additions as I encounter and remember more cool stuff. (Disclaimer: I am pretty damn far left of center, a fact which I make no apologies for, but which certainly informs my news sources and the things I choose to read. I think being better-informed is a nonpartisan activity, but my Twitter feed also doesn't contain a single political commentator who self-identifies as conservative except the National Review Online. Just sayin'.)

a general note about finding cool stuff to read online
I get my online news primarily four ways:

1) Twitter. I follow a group of magazines, newspapers, journalists, bloggers, people who are paid to think, etc. My timeline thus usually somewhat reflects what’s going on in the world of lefty politics, environmental news and the like, without me having to individually check the websites of everyone cool who I try to pay attention to.

Some people I would highly recommend for having a well-rounded feed:
Pro Publica (nonprofit indie investigative journalism)
Grist (environmental news)
Feministing (awesome feminist blog)
Mother Jones (my favorite nonprofit journalists ever)
Colorlines (racial justice analysis and news)
RH Reality Check (reproductive and sexual health and access news)
AlterNet (leftist news)
GOOD (a magazine covering a variety of topics, generally into highlighting cool stuff people are doing)
Naomi Klein (author of The Shock Doctrine, commentator on various issues)
High Country News (news about the American West, strong environmental coverage)
Wikileaks (they open governments, apparently)
Al Jazeera English (great global coverage)

2) Reddit. If you're unaware, reddit is a social news site grouped by topic. Basically, users can subscribe to different sub-reddits focusing on different subjects, which can be general (politics, environment) or very specific (Occupy Wall Street, guerrilla gardening). Users submit links to different sub-reddits, which are then voted up or down by other users. So the front page of any given reddit displays links that are the most well-liked by the community as a whole. And your personal front page displays the same for all the sub-reddits you subscribe to. It's a pretty cool way of finding weird articles you otherwise might not about stuff you're interested in. Plus, you can comment on links and generate discussions with other interested people.

3) Longform.org and longreads.org. These two sites collect submissions of longform journalism--generally articles that take at least 10 or so minutes to read. They both post a few new articles each day. Longform has articles organized by topic, so if you want to learn a lot about a particular country or issue, it can be a great source. Longreads lets you search all their articles for keywords of interest. Both sites will also post content that's timely, such as collections of articles about Steve Jobs right after he died. In general, they're best for going deep into interesting or random things, or for people who just appreciate good writing, and less good for keeping up on current events.

4) The New York Times. While somewhat vanilla, it's a damn good all-around general news source. If you’re not a subscriber, you can get access to something like 20 articles online per month free. Articles you click on links to (for example, via Twitter, Facebook, or email) don’t count against this limit. Another good daily general news sources is the BBC. Also The Economist.

One other thing: more than being about following the right people on Twitter or reading the best articles out there, being well-informed is mostly a choice. You have to decide that you're going to dedicate a certain amount of time every day, whether it's ten minutes or three hours, to figuring out what's going on in the world. By all means, go for what you're interested in. I follow reproductive healthcare issues very closely, because it's something I care deeply about. I didn't pay as much attention to the Arab Spring as I probably should have, because it just didn't grab me. There are far too many things going on in the world for you to ever know all of them. Don't let it stop you from getting started.

Now then, here are some specific topics I care about with books and articles that I think are especially helpful for understanding them.


food and food politics
1) books
The Omnivore’s Dilemma—Michael Pollan
The classic explaining what’s wrong with our industrial food system, especially industrial meat and corn, and how we might go about fixing it. Not a great analysis of some key food justice issues, like food deserts and access to healthy options, but a great introduction to what’s out there.

Fast Food Nation—Eric Schlosser
I actually like this a lot better than Omnivore’s Dilemma. It explores the history of fast food and looks at industrial potato farming, flavor additives, slaughterhouses and a whole bunch of other related issues. My favorite part is the fact that he looks at industrial meat production from a labor standpoint, not just from a this-is-gross-and-unethical perspective.

Animal Factory—David Kirby
For people interested in factory farms, this book is a nice break from the usual literature focused on animal torture and gross health violations. It focuses on the efforts of local activists in rural areas (all self-identified Republicans) to stop factory farms near their homes because of human health and odor concerns. It's a refreshingly personal and unique perspective.

Stuffed and Starved—Raj Patel
This is an awesome book about global food politics. It's a bit academic in tone, and has been criticized for being one-sided with regard to the causes of poverty in developing countries. But I think it has a ton of interesting perspectives about government food policy, genetically modified crops and a bunch of other important topics.


Tomatoland: How Modern Industrial Agriculture Destroyed Our Most Alluring Fruit—Barry Estabrook
The title of this book is somewhat misleading, because the majority of it is actually about the slave labor used to grow most Florida tomatoes and the way undocumented immigrants are exploited for cheap fruit (which, in my opinion, is even more interesting). Though it also talks about tomato genes, organic producers and a few other things. But anyway, it's an awesome book, whether you're into good food, social justice, immigrant rights, or whatever.


Sweet Charity: Emergency Food and the End of Entitlement—Janet Poppendieck
This is an awesomely thought-provoking book. The author essentially argues that food banks and other food giveaway things have done more harm than good in addressing food insecurity in the US. She discusses how American values, such as not wasting food, inform the kinds of actions being taken to address hunger, and how the concept of "poverty" has been almost completely redefined as an issue of "hunger".

Empty Pleasures: The Story of Artificial Sweeteners from Saccharin to Splenda—Carolyn de la Pena
A great cultural history of artificial sweeteners, including where they came from, how they were marketed, how gender and a desire for "control" played into their popularity and how efforts to regulate or control them have been resisted.

2) articles
On Racialicious, an awesome essay about growing up in a food desert.

My own blog post from this summer: what I learned about food justice and food "choice" during two years behind a checkstand.

How Goldman Sachs gambled on starvation.

From Foreign Policy magazine, the new geopolitics of food.

The Seattle Times explores what quinoa's rising popularity in affluent countries has done to Bolivia and other exporters.

3) blogs and sites for news
Tom Philpott, food blogger for Mother Jones
Raj Patel's blog



financial crisis
In general, there are a few great journalists who have covered the collapse very well from different angles. 

Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone has some great articles explaining how we got here and ranting about the moral bankruptcy of Wall Street. He's also written a few books about the crash, most recently Giftopia, which would be good for further reading. Among his articles, these are my favorites:
-Is the Securities and Exchange Comission (SEC) covering up Wall Street crimes?
-On the lack of enforcement: Why Isn't Wall Street in Jail?
-Wall Street's Bailout Hustle

Michael Lewis of Vanity Fair has also written extensively about the collapse, focusing more on the Euro Zone. His article on Greece, "Beware of Greeks Bearing Bonds", is a great explanation of the state of Greece's economy. He's also covered Ireland and what all these failing Euro countries will mean for Germany. He's written several books as well--The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, which explores the housing market/derivative crisis through the eyes of people who saw it coming; and Boomerang: Travels in the New Third World, which looks at the economies that have been collapsing around the world.

Bethany McLean, also with Vanity Fair, has covered investment baking for a while (she was one of the journalists who broke the Enron story). She has an excellent article exploring the disconnect between how we see Goldman Sachs and how the company sees itself, post-crash, and another piece on the history of Merril Lynch and how its corporate culture contributed to the mortgage crisis.

A German paper, Spiegel, did an excellent, if somewhat dry, series explaining the collapse of the Euro Zone very clearly. (Parts one, two and three.)

Mother Jones, my favorite magazine ever, has a timeline from 2008 tracing the history of the housing/financial crisis.


American society/culture/labor
Reefer Madness—Eric Schlosser
By the Fast Food Nation guy, this book explores the underground economy in the US by looking at three markets: marijuana, porn, and illegal immigrant labor. It's a fascinating history of drug wars, obscenity laws and a bunch of other random things.

Methland—Nick Reding
One of my favorite books ever. It explores what the meth epidemic has done to small-town America, which means that in addition to being about drugs, it talks about the crippling effects that job loss and industrial agriculture have had in rural areas.

Nickle and Dimed—Barbara Ehrenreich
A classic from the mid-90s. The author goes "undercover" and works a variety of minimum-wage jobs to see how hard it is to survive. Not the most eye-opening today if you pay attention to the real world, but it puts a face on problems that can seem abstract.

The Working Poor—David Shipley
Kind of a more modern updated of Nickle and Dimed, the authors goes around and interviews a bunch of working poor people. It's a nicely balanced book—the fact that some of the individuals he profiles have made bad choices or have problems like drug addiction isn't glossed over, but Shipley also looks at structural factors that have kept working people in poverty.

The single best summary I've ever read of Ayn Rand's crazy libertarian/"Objectivist" philosophy, why the right is infatuated with it, and why it's completely wrong.


environmental stuff
Cadillac Desert—Marc Reisner
A classic looking at the history of dam building in the US, mostly the American West. It examines the politics that led to so many stupid dams getting approved and some of the financial and environmental ramifications.

Dead Pool: Lake Powell, Global Warming and the Future of Water in the West—James Powell
A more updated book about Western water politics, looking at the future of the Colorado River Basin as global warming starts diminishing water supplies.

Chasing Molecules—Elizabeth Grossman
An environmental chemistry exploration of biologically pervasive molecules (like flame retardants and dioxins) and the health effects they're having on people. Informative and easy to read.

Endgame (Volume 1: The Problem of Civilization and Volume 2: Resistance)—Derrick Jensen
This is by one of my favorite authors, the anti-civilization activist Derrick Jensen. He's very radical, and I disagree with him on several key things, but his writing does a beautiful job of tying together seemingly disparate problems like pollution, sweatshop labor, the prison-industrial complex and rape. Other good books of his to check out are A Language Older Than Words, The Culture of Make Believe and Thought to Exist in the Wild: Awakening from the Nightmare of Zoos.

If a Tree Falls: The Story of the Earth Liberation Front
An awesome documentary about ELF which raises great questions about what kinds of activism are effective, what should be considered terrorism, etc. Available on Netflix Instant as well.

FLOW: For Love of Water
A documentary looking at corporate privatization of the world's water supplies. Also on Netflix Instant.


US-Mexico border/immigration
The Devil's Highway—Luis Alberto Urrea
The story of the Yuma 14, a group of 26 Mexican migrants whose story started with a journey across the Arizona desert and ended with fourteen of them being flown home in bodybags. A great examination of the way US border policies contribute to deaths in the desert, beautifully written.

Amexica: War Along the Borderline—Ed Vulliamy
The most comprehensive border book I've ever read, tying together the drug trade, illegal immigration, the rise of maquilas, the effects of free trade agreements, the murders and violence in Ciudad Juarez and elsewhere, poverty and everything else you can think of. He's also written an article for The Nation, As Juarez Falls.

Murder City: Ciudad Juarez and the Global Economy's New Killing Fields—Charles Bowden
Bowden has covered the border for at least 20 years, and his latest book looks at the violence in Ciudad Juarez as a phenomenon that has gone beyond a simple explanation, like drug wars. He argues that Juarez has reached a tipping point where violence is part of the social order and that the breakdown of Juarez tells us a lot about the future of global capitalism.

The New York Times Magazine looks at the relationship between the border cities of Ciudad Juarez, the murder capital of the world, and El Paso, Texas, one of the safest cities in the US.

Business Week examines the labor market in the US in the wake of Alabama's strict immigration laws. Turns out a lot of Americans don't want to do the jobs left behind.




development, aid, international relations, global issues
The Shock Doctrine—Naomi Klein
If you want to read one book to learn as much as possible about the world, read this one. It's a history of the way neoliberal economic theory (privatization, deregulation, etc.) has been applied all over the world by the US, the IMF and the World Bank, for the benefit of private corporations and wealthy/powerful individuals, usually with disastrous consequences for the people actually living in these countries. Even if you believe that neoliberal policies have benefited these countries in the long run, it sheds light on the complete lack of democratic process which often accompanies Chicago School economic policy.

Half the Sky—Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn
A look at the ways women are oppressed around the world, from sex slavery to maternal mortality, which highlights NGOs and initiatives that are making a difference. Focuses more on local, grassroots groups than on big NGOs like CARE and Heifer International, which I like (though those guys are in there too).

An awesome interview with Michael Maren, a former Peace Corps volunteer and aid worker, analyzing why aid has been completely useless for developing countries. (Another book, The White Man's Burden by William Easterly, also argues this thesis. I haven't read it personally, but it's supposed to be pretty good.)

GQ has an awesome three-part series on the international sex trade. Part one is about sex clubs in the Philippines, part two is about sex trafficking and part three looks at sex tourism in Costa Rica.

My hometown paper, the Seattle Stranger, has a series investigating why cocaine showing up in Seattle was being cut with levamisole, a cattle deworming drug that can kill you. On the way, the author uncovers a bunch of interesting information about the global cocaine trade. Part one looks at the levamisole-tainted cocaine in Seattle, part two investigates the global trade and part three looks at the death toll from the last 100 years of US drug policy and argues for legalization as the best solution.




technology
Although I often take issue with his conclusions, Malcolm Gladwell's essay Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted is a great look at the limits of social media inspired activism.

Generation Why? One of the best essays I've ever read. It's a review of The Social Network, a critique of Facebook and a plea for our generation to do something better without being condescending.

How Google Dominates Us: a much-needed synthesis of the most recent books about Google exploring privacy, their search algorithms, and the ubiquity of Google in our lives

Wired on Amazon's increasing domination of the Internet.

A profile of Sheryl Sandberg, the Google VP who left to become the Chief Operating Officer for Facebook. Also one of the few women in Silicon Valley.

The Great Tech War of 2012: Apple vs. Amazon vs. Facebook vs. Google.


I read way too much about the future of journalism on the internet, but this Columbia Journalism Review piece is one of my favorites. It calls into question many of the agreed-upon solutions for the future of news, like that news organizations will become less prominent and we'll see more "citizen journalism". It argues that specialized knowledge and expertise is still important for news to serve its watchdog function.




feminism, gender, sex, LGBTQ
Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape—edited by Jessica Valenti and Jaclyn Friedman
I cannot recommend this book highly enough. It goes way beyond rape to look at the ways society constructs female sexuality, issues of consent, and how we can go about building a better model of sexuality that will help everyone have more fulfilling sex lives and relationships.

The Madame Curie Complex: The Hidden History of Women in Science—Julie des Jardins
Using Marie Curie as a starting point, the author looks at the role women have played in scientific discoveries, and the ways narratives of women in science are constructed to fit in with society's standards for "acceptable" roles for women.

Dan Savage, America's sex columnist, on the virtues of nonmonogamy for saving marriages.

Teaching Good Sex: a novel sex ed class at a high school in Pennsylvania.

A good overview of feminism and its history from Bitch magazine.

Savior vs. Savior: Looking at the murder of Dr. George Tiller, an abortion provider by Scott Roeder, an anti-abortion activist.

Schrodinger's Rapist: A Guy's Guide to Approaching Strange Women Without Getting Maced

Queering Ecology: Orion Magazine looks at queer behavior in the animal kingdom

blogs/sites:
Feministing: general feminist news and commentary
Feministe: general feminist news and commentary
Savage Love, Dan Savage's sex advice column, which is awesome
Microagressions, a Tumblr which looks at people's daily experiences with sexism, racism, etc.

12.30.2011

Best of 2011

Here are my favorites from everything I've written this year. I'm excluding my recent post on rape culture, because it appears to have taken on a life of its own and it doesn't seem fair to compare it to my other posts with their much more modest readership.


Yasuni: time for environmentalists to hold the line

Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park is one of the most biodiverse areas on earth. In one hectare, you’ll find more tree species in Yasuní than exist in the entirety of North America. Naturally, Yasuní also has huge oil reserves buried under it. Under the lush forest, there are estimated to be 846 million barrels of oil (20% of Ecuador’s total reserve), which would take ten years to extract. It’s not just any oil, either. It’s bituminous oil, better known as tar sands, oil that releases 5-15% more carbon dioxide carbon in its extraction and refinement than traditional crude does.



I am (almost) the 1%
On a personal level, it’s hard for me to pin down my feelings about Occupy Wall Street. As the movement has encouraged people to come forward and share stories under the theme “We Are the 99%”, I’ve taken a look at my own circumstances in life. Technically, I am part of the 99%. My family doesn’t rake in millions of dollars a year, I don’t have a trust fund, and I will have to work a real job in the real world to support myself once I get out of college. But that’s where my similarities with most of the 99% end. 


The gay conversation

The boys were discussing songs for their band, and Nico mentioned loving some song by John Mayer. His friend agreed, and I shook my head.

“What?” the friend asked me.

“Nothing, he’s just an asshole and a womanizer,” I responded. We discussed this for a little while—they wanted to know how I knew this. Eventually, we agreed that his music was one thing, but as a person, he was probably an asshole.

And then Nico’s friend says, “Well, at least he’s not gay.”



Turtles, time and something like silence
It’s almost one in the morning when I see my first turtle. She’s a leatherback, black and almost six feet long. She moves up the beach in the dark, slowly, as if carrying a great burden. Turning her massive body, back feet now facing us, she begins to dig. There’s sand flying everywhere, and we move to avoid it, trying to be quiet. There are six of us staring at her, but she seems almost oblivious to our presence. She’s focused on the task at hand. With the hole dug, she stands over it and lets her eggs drop in. They come in bursts, slimy and about the size of golf balls, falling into the sand, plopping into the nest she’s made. As she lets them go, tears stream down her face. Locals say that she’s crying at the thought of being separated from her babies. Science says she’s shedding salt from her body. There’s so much gravity in the air, so much at stake that I want to believe she feels what’s going on. In a world where fewer and fewer turtles are able to survive long enough to complete the cycle she’s beginning tonight, her presence here is beautiful, awe-inspiring, a tale of triumph. And yet the odds are stacked against her.


Poverty and food choice
Even controlling for all these factors, buying large quantities of soda is a pretty good predictor of whether someone is on food stamps, at least in my experience. When I first noticed this, it seemed incredibly illogical to me. Buying soda at all made no sense to me, but buying it when you couldn’t afford to feed your family seemed like throwing money away.

I’ve talked about the soda issue with a few friends, and seeing people’s reactions has been really interesting. Several friends of mine (liberal, pro-social welfare people) have expressed shock that soda is covered on food stamps at all. I’ve heard things to the effect of, “If they want to buy that crap, fine, but we shouldn’t be paying for it.” Underlying this belief, I think, is the idea that by excluding soda from food stamps, we can make a statement that we, as a society, don’t believe that this food is good for you, the recipients of social welfare. In short, we will educate the ill-informed poor people about making healthy nutritional choices.


An open letter to my future less-radical self
I want to remind you what you used to be like, before you settled down. The nights you fell asleep thinking that sometimes, you wanted nothing more than to watch Issaquah burn to the ground and see a forest grow back in its place. The evenings you spent plotting guerilla schemes to plant carrots in the middle of golf courses when you had papers you were supposed to be writing. The day you walked through one of the largest coal plants in the country, when you thought about leaving the group to attempt a one-woman sabotage of the computer system, but opted to take two hundred photos of generators and clouds of smoke instead. The weeks and months you searched for a revolutionary who lived up to his legend, who wasn’t just another dictator-to-be waiting to abolish term limits and seize land. Your burning desire to be a journalist, to uncover the worst of humanity, to travel the globe in search of suffering and resilience and speak truth, no matter its costs.


The human construction of nature (aka deep green, part 2)
The human/nature divide is an artificial one. For most of human history, people have lived in “wild” areas, and nature was historically a place where people got food and building materials and tons of other stuff. The idea of setting aside land as “wilderness” would have seemed foreign to most cultures that have existed before ours, and American wilderness was often made by kicking native peoples off of their lands so John Muir and Theodore Roosevelt could enjoy their scenic views of mountains unmolested. 

The deep green stuff I’ve read seems to be mostly on board with this, but they draw another divide—industrial civilization versus indigenous cultures. Indigenous cultures are integrated into their landbases and able to live in a sustainable way without depleting natural resources. In contrast, industrial civilization is systematically destroying the planet.



The importance of choice, or, why my negative pregnancy test made me mad at the Republican Party
I was lucky. But it could have gone the other way. I could have been pregnant now or this spring or last year or a dozen other times. I’ve had one or two other minor pregnancy scares, but none of them—not even this one—has been a truly scary experience for me. The reason for that is because I know that where I live, it’s still legal for me (and only me) to decide what I want to do if I do get pregnant.



Intag: development and protest

If you’re a scientist, you might like to know that the Intag Cloud Forest Reserve is home to some of the most spectacular biodiversity on the planet—219 species of birds recorded, more orchid species present than in the entire United States. Even if you’re not science-minded, you’ll appreciate the fact that the Andean tropics contain at least 15% of the entire world’s plant species when you’re walking through the forest or stopping to admire the breathtaking views of rolling hills punctuated by the occasional plot of maize, yucca or banana. Locals in the pueblos surrounding the forest walk for hours to harvest food and visit family members in neighboring towns. The whole area isn’t a postcard for living in harmony with nature—there’s plenty of blaring radio music at all hours of the day and night, not to mention beer and rowdy games of fútbol. But the chaos of daily human life blends almost seamlessly with the natural world, and the area has an undeniable beauty to it, the kind that makes you want to pack up everything you own and buy a one way plane ticket to Ecuador.

Of course, if you’re a mining company, you see Intag in an entirely different way.



Sustainable agricultural development
Over the past two weeks, I’ve read a bunch of articles written by African agricultural experts, and talked to government officials and NGO representatives about the best way to develop Ghana’s agricultural sector. 

Most agricultural strategy I’ve come across, both from the Ghanaian government and assorted NGOs, seems to focus on building a more industrial agricultural system. Publications point out that the vast majority of Africa’s farmers are subsistence level (1% of the US population farms, and these farmers grow a surplus of food; meanwhile, 70ish% of Ghanaians farm and the country still imports staples like rice). As far as I can tell, this is seen as a bad thing. Most strategies for agricultural development suggest that the way forward involves larger farms, fewer farmers, more efficient distribution, irrigation, increased fertilizer use and improved seed varieties.


Personal purity isn't political activism
We gathered as a group to discuss the events that had shaped the past half-century in Guatemala. We talked about the horrors and heartbreak that the country had been made to endure, largely at the hands of powerful US interests. After we had been talking for a while, Chris Fontana, our program director shook his head sadly and said to the group, “And all this so we could have cheaper bananas…”

At the time, that statement angered me unspeakably, though I couldn’t quite articulate why. I was angry at the way the United Fruit Company had political connections which allowed them to basically request a coup from the State Department. I was angry at the lack of democratic process inherent in military operations. I was angry at the collusion between corporations and the state. I wanted transparency, accountability, authentic political participation. Chris’s statement seemed to ignore all of these concerns. He reduced the issue down to one of individual choice, of conscious consumerism. His message seemed to be that if US consumers had been paying enough attention, they could have successfully boycotted Chiquita and demanded that the price of bananas reflect their actual cost, which would have magically prevented the coup. We all know that when the interests of power and capital come up against a group of law-abiding citizens making respectful demands, the people always win. Every single time.


What it means to be in love
Environmentalists are always saying they love the earth. I do love the earth—I love hiking and the scenic views of mountains that make my soul breathe a bit easier. But when I get out in forests, I remember that I feel more than just love for the earth. I’m in love with the earth, so completely. My love isn’t the chaste admiration of Emerson or Thoreau. It’s not about writing poetry inspired by majestic sunrises. My love is intimate, physical, wet, wild.

12.12.2011

Readjustment

Things I missed
Seattle tap water
the smell of winter
cheese that isn't queso fresco
salt and vinegar chips
Netflix Instant
my cat
breathing deep and tasting pine trees
sourdough bread
baking cookies
the public library



Things I miss
yuca chips
sun
the ability to travel across the country for less than $10
speaking Spanish
the sunset in Intag
being able to buy a three course meal for $2
the abundance of pirated DVD stores



Things that are just weird
throwing toilet paper in the toilet
the fact that it's dark from 4pm-7am
not being visibly "different"
adjusting my stomach to American bacteria again
riding a bus without hearing Pitbull or traditional Ecuadorian music

12.09.2011

Life lessons from Ecuador

As weird as it sounds to say it, I'm flying home later today. After four months in Ecuador, I have barely begun to process how I've changed and all the things I've learned this semester. At some point in the future, I'll be updating with more serious insights, but for now, it's time for a list of the important life lessons I've gotten out of this experience.

1) You haven't truly been on a motorcycle until you're hitchhiking up a cobblestoned and gravel road going up a mountain with three people on the back.
2) Real cheddar cheese is a sorely underappreciated thing. Especially on nachos. Relatedly, nachos should never involve eggplant.
3) Wearing an alpaca poncho may make you look like the world's biggest gringo, but it will also be the softest, warmest and most comfortable thing you've ever put on. Totally worth it when you're living in a wooden shack in the cloud forest.
4) When they tell you during orientation that the altitude will affect your body's ability to process alcohol, they are not kidding. Chupa con cuidado.
5) Every male in Quito between the ages of 15 and 30 knows exactly one English phrase: ¨Hey baby¨. The best way to deal with this situation involves your middle finger.
6) It doesn't matter how high-wasted your pants are, how much you tucked your shirt in or how much bug spray you're wearing. The wasps that live in the canopy tower will still find a way to sting you on the ass.
7) The best response to the overwhelming beauty of sunset in the Galapagos Islands involves warrior pose.
8) What happens on the chiva stays on the chiva. What happens on a park bench next to the chiva also stays on the chiva.
9) Harvesting oats for 25 hours by hand is exhausting, and working on a farm with Ecuadorian farmers will make you feel like the laziest person in the entire world.
10) When in the course of your journalism project to tour gold mines you get stranded in a town three hours from home and have to spend the night at a crazy old Russian man's house, you may want to make sure that he hasn't fathered a child with his own daughter first. Fortunately, nothing bad happened.
11) Just because someone is your host dad doesn't mean he won't charge you $80 to drive you to two interviews.
12) As much as American TV news seems to have embraced the ¨if it bleeds, it leads¨ philosophy of journalism, at least they generally don't go to the scene of a recent car crash to show graphic footage of bodies being removed from the wreckage and then interview the sobbing parents or siblings of the dead person on site and air all of this live at 7am while you're eating breakfast.
13) There's something about spending a month commuting on harrowing mountain roads mostly by sitting in the back of pickup trucks or standing in the aisle of Greyhound buses that makes you appreciate life a lot.
14) Ecuadorian clubs play a combined total of 7 songs. All of them are by Pitbull.
15) Spending two and a half hours going around a circle with your friends and telling everyone how awesome they are is one of the best ways to spend an evening.

9.21.2011

Ideology without a label (aka this I believe)

Over the past year or so, I’ve been trying to come up with a more cohesive political ideology. I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about how to frame problems in the world, effective strategies for activism and what I want the world to look like. I feel pretty secure in my beliefs and opinions (though they’re constantly evolving), but I don’t really have a good label to easily explain myself to other people. Liberal implies a faith in gradual reform and the state that I no longer have. Socialist doesn’t include my environmental convictions, and assumes the continued existence of a large, centralized state. Marxist has similar issues, plus some not-so-great historical connotations. Just saying environmentalist implies looking to the state for solutions to environmental problems, and doesn’t address the intersectionality of environmental and social justice. Deep green implies being anti-civilization and/or a primitivist, which I’m not. Feminist is great, but it doesn’t say much about my environmental or political convictions. Left-of-center is accurate, but really general. Anti-capitalist is probably accurate, but throwing that one out means explaining the difference between a market-based economy based on equal exchange versus a corporatist economy where the state exists largely to protect the interests of capital at the expense of most people and the environment. Anarchist come pretty close too, but most people grossly misunderstand what anarchism means, and I don’t feel like I’ve read enough about the history of anarchist thought to identify myself as such without some qualifiers, since historically, anarchists have advocated a number of things I definitely don’t agree with. I like the term “communalist”, which I came across in the writings of Murray Bookchin, but if I’m asked to explain my politics to someone, no one is going to understand what that means.

I’m not sure labels are really conducive to meaningful political discussion anyway. I’ve read enough stories of self-identified Republicans becoming environmental activists when the river by their home started being polluted by mine tailings or feedlot runoff to know that the labels we choose for ourselves are rarely fixed or immutable. I still find myself self-identifying with the Democratic Party at times (eg. “We lost twelve seats in the last election”), because, as much as I hate the faux-democracy our federal political system is, I understand that some little things I care about (funding for NGOs who provide comprehensive reproductive healthcare in developing countries) fare much better under a Democratic administration. People round up or round down for labels all the time—how many people are really 100% straight or gay? In my experience, labels of any kind—sexual orientation, political affiliation, relationship status, sometimes even gender—are best used as starting points for conversation, and shouldn’t be taken as accurate, complete summaries of who someone is or what they believe. But in spite of their limitations, labels can be useful.

The problem for me with not having a label is that I can’t self-identify as part of a group. Saying you’re a Democrat might not be a perfect summary of your political beliefs, but most people who hear you say it would assume that you’re pro-choice, pro-unions, into redistribution of wealth and have at least a vague sense of concern about the environment. Popular reactions to “socialist” and “libertarian” might not be as accurate, but still, if you throw either one of those out, people have a general idea of what you’re talking about. In contrast, if you say that your political ideology is desde abajo y a la izquierda (from below and to the left), you’re going to have some explaining to do. Which isn’t always a bad thing—explaining your chosen terminology can be a teachable moment. When my roommate freshman year told me she identified as “queer” rather than “bisexual”, we had a great conversation about what that word means to her, which segued into a nice discussion about sexual identity in general. But sometimes, just for the sake of making conversations easier, I wish I had a better-understood word to describe where I am on the political spectrum.

In lieu of an appropriate label, though, I feel like I should lay out some of my fundamental beliefs. There are a lot of things I believe, but these are the ones I feel pretty solid about and think are important.

  • While authentic, community-level democracy is not a panacea and won’t guarantee solutions to problems, it’s a necessary prerequisite for addressing almost all social and environmental problems and injustices. This means that every community needs to have sovereign authority to decide what happens to it, free from outside coercion. This means that if the people of Intag, Ecuador say they don’t want a copper mine in their cloud forest, the copper company goes away instead of spreading lies, hiring paramilitaries and getting the Ecuadorian state to back them.
  • One of my former high school teachers, Steve Miranda, told me that if your school is too big for everyone in it to sit in a circle in the morning and check-in with each other, then your school is too big. I pretty much agree with this point, and I think the same should be said for governed bodies. Once all the people a decision affects can’t sit around and debate that decision, you lose a ton of democracy in the process. Which explains why federal policy is a complete nightmare, state policy is better but still really bad, and city/county-level policy is better yet, but still pretty bad.
  • Related to the above two points, so many of our problems are connected to the existence of the state (large, centralized power) and the way it defends class interests. I’m pretty sure reform can’t fix this (if electing Obama didn’t prove that, I don’t know what will). But I don’t have much of an idea of feasible ways to transition from the federal system we have now to authentic, local forms of democracy. I just know that it really, really needs to happen.
  •   The pervasiveness of rape in our culture is not an anomaly; it’s a natural byproduct of the way our culture constructs sexuality. Combatting rape and sexual violence requires taking on rape culture, including victim-blaming, the virgin-whore dichotomy, the stigmatization of sex in general and the stigmatization female sexuality in particular. Which has everything to do with attempts to limit access to reproductive healthcare (which is, as far as I’m concerned, a form of violence against women).
  • Defensive rights trump offensive rights (thanks to Derrick Jensen for this one). My right to live next to a healthy, functioning forest (and that forest’s right to exist) trump your perceived right to cut it down in order to make money. My right to breathe clean air and not live on a dangerously warming planet trump your right to burn coal, even if you have that whole “private property” thing to fall back on. My right to the integrity of my body trumps your perceived right to rape me or make laws about whether or not I’m  legally obligated to carry a fetus to term.
  • Food security (all people having access to enough food to sustain them) isn’t enough if we really want to fix our food system. We need food sovereignty, which means that communities actually have control over the means of production for their food, and that food is sufficient, nutritional and culturally appropriate.
  •  In addition to drastic social and political changes, our culture needs to re-think some of our core beliefs, particularly the sense of entitlement so many people have. We’ve gotten locked in this mentality that food should be cheap and easy to produce and prepare, that power is available with the flick of a switch. We’ve grown a bit soft around the edges and forgotten how to take care of ourselves, and we’re going to need to re-learn that sometime before oil runs out.
  •  In spite of the many serious problems in the world, I have been extraordinary fortunate and blessed with an easy, happy and fulfilling life. While I recognize that life is a product of extreme privilege, it also serves as a reminder of what’s possible for everyone if we’re able to be radical and visionary enough to make it happen.

9.01.2011

Bucket list


Today, I’m thinking about the world, how many amazing experiences there are to have out there. I feel called to so many places. I want to raft the Colorado, stand in solidarity with activists from every corner of the world, learn to play guitar and go to Juarez so I can stand unflinching in the face of our culture’s killing fields. I’m in Ecuador now, trying so hard to be place-based. But I still have to daydream, so I thought I’d take a minute to make an updated version of my bucket list. Here’s my official list of things I want to do or learn before I die.

1 go to every state in the US (still need: alabama arkansas georgia illinois indiana iowa kansas kentucky lousiana minnesota mississippi missouri nebraska northcarolina northdakota ohio oklahoma southcarolina tennesee westvirginia wisconsin)

2 go to every national park in the US (not the monuments and historical sites, just the real parks)

3  spend at least a month or two working on the border and trying to understand the politics, economics, cultures and people that exist in that space

4 stay up all night inside the Arctic Circle during the summer

5 catch, kill, cook and eat a wild mammal

6 learn to play guitar and sing well enough to lead a campfire

7 go on an absurdly long walking trip, whether it’s the PCT, the Appalachian Trail or maybe just across the country, Forrest Gump style

8 write a (nonfiction) book, even if I’m the only one who ever reads it

9 have an amazing garden based on permaculture principles, even/especially if I’m living in the middle of the city

10 become passable (not quite fluent) in at least two languages besides English

11 engage in meaningful activism, in a long-term, bottom up sort of fashion

12 do a meditation retreat

13 go to Burning Man

14 spend a week completely alone in the wilderness. this could also be a Vision Quest type thing.

15 go on a completely spontaneous road trip

16 mentor someone for a substantial period of time (like, longer than a year)

17 work/volunteer at a domestic violence shelter or hotline

18 learn to sew and knit

19 travel to every continent except Antarctica

20 do something concrete to fix/improve our food system

8.20.2011

What I'm thinking for next summer

As this summer wraps up, I find myself thinking about all the amazing people I’ve been lucky enough to know and all the awesome things they’ve been doing. I’m feeling free knowing that I don’t have a job at Safeway, which means I’m under no pressure to stay in Seattle or Walla Walla next summer just for work. And I’ve been having such an amazing time traveling in Ghana and Ecuador, meeting people from all over the world who are on such varied adventures. All of this is making me think about what I want to do next summer. So of course, I made a list (is it just me, or do I really like lists?) And the best part is that I could probably do two or three of these ideas in the same summer! Basically, my goal is to make this summer look super boring by comparison, though four continents in three months might be hard to beat.

Here’s what I’m thinking, in approximate order of what sounds coolest to me right now (this may change in like five minutes):

1) Finally satisfy my burning desire to understand Mexico and the border by volunteering for No More Deaths, a humanitarian aid group which works in the desert Southwest.

2) Relatedly, I could do a summer program with the Mexico Solidarity Network, which is an awesome study abroad program focusing on social justice movements in Mexico. This might cost more than I could reasonably afford, but it’s definitely still high on the list.

3) Go to India with the family. With Dad living in Ghana, he and Mom have been meeting for vacations in Europe together. But after Greece this summer, we had a serious family discussion about taking a trip somewhere a bit more adventurous, and India was pretty high on the list. With a bit of cajoling, I could probably make this happen.

4) Stay in Walla Walla. I’m really motivated to do this because it would allow me to be in the same place for a whole continuous year and a half (January 2012 until May 2013 when I graduate), which hasn’t happened since I left high school. As much as I’ve been really happy traveling the West and the world, it’s nice to settle down in one place for a while and get involved in organizations and projects there. If I did stay (and I almost certainly will for whatever part of the summer I’m not traveling during), I would want to get started on my thesis, put a lot of energy into being on the board of the Walla Walla co-op, read a ton of books and have an easy part-time job. Mostly, though, I would want to focus on my writing, which could take a number of forms. I’ve been seriously thinking about writing a book about my experiences working at a grocery store, because there is not yet a definitive food politics book about the grocery industry, the way there is for fast food (Fast Food Nation, Eric Schlosser), industrial agriculture (The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan), vegetarianism (Eating Animals, Jonathan Safer Foer), global food justice issues (Stuffed and Starved, Raj Patel) or the politics behind nutrition and food regulation (Food Politics, Marion Nestle). Writing could also potentially involve working on stories to freelance, getting an internship with the Walla Walla Union Bulliten or just blogging a lot about my experiences volunteering with cool organizations. Plus, I’ve never gotten to see the farmer’s market in its full glory during the middle of summer, and I think it would be really fun to try to eat 100% locally for the whole summer.

5) Backpack around South America or India with a friend. This would be conditional on being able to convince someone to come with me, since I don’t think I would enjoy traveling alone for longer than a week or two. Bonus points if my family is going to India anyway (#3).


6) Roadtrip around the US, preferably with a friend. The goal would be either filling in my states list, which would mean the Midwest or (better) the South, or filling in my National Parks list, which might involve more of the West that I love so dearly. This could be a precursor to #1 if I end up driving to the border instead of flying there. Really, I would rather drive. Planes suck, and the West is gorgeous.

7) Work on a farm in the US. After my first experience with WOOFing here in Ecuador, I’d love to see something a little closer to home too.

Right now, I’m leaning towards a combo of #1,2 and 4. Or possibly 1,3 and 4. Or just 1 and 4. The border has been calling me for a while, though, and I think it’s just something I really need to do. And really, besides that, I just want to relax and write something good enough to prove to myself that I can make this whole crazy plan to not ever have a real job work out.