Earlier this summer, when I was reading and thinking about environmental philosophy and deep green more, I also went back and re-read my journal from Semester in the West * and realized that I wrote a lot of good things over the course of the semester that I’d like to be out there with my name on them. To that end, I’ve typed up my journal and created an archive, which is now up on the blog, with entries backdated to reflect when I actually wrote them. In some cases, the entries aren’t word-for-word as they appear in my journal; rather, I used my journal text to expand on something brought up by my experiences. Where necessary, I’ve also prefaced each entry with information about where I was and what I was doing at the time to add context.
I’ve tagged all entries with SITW, which was the tag I used for all SITW blog entries published during the semester as well. If you only want to see the newly added journal entries, I’ve also used the tag SITW journal.
If you’re interested in specific topics, some common themes are activism, grazing, climate change, environmental philosophy and nature writing.
If you don’t want to pore through three months of my rambling thoughts, here are the entries I think are the best, in chronological order:
• Wolves and ranchers (best summary of the wolf issue from a personal standpoint)
• Ecology scares me
• Camp life (best reflection on what's it's like to live outside)
• Managing nature
• Putting plastic squares on fences (best musing on conservation/environmental philosophy)
• Walking through canyonlands (best nature writing)
• Tracking
• Climate nihilism (best thing about climate change, inspired by visiting a coal plant)
• Industrial solar in the desert
• End of the semester: this I believe (best summary of what I learned over the course of the semester)
I’m still working on revising and organizing my more polished Semester in the West writing, but when I finish that to my satisfaction, I’ll get it up here too. And at some point in the future, I’ll try to create a better record of all of the writing I’ve done for the Pio (Whitman’s newspaper) as well.
*For readers who don’t know me in real life or are unfamiliar, Semester in the West is a field program run by Whitman College, where I’m currently a junior. It takes twenty-one students on a semester-long road trip around the American West to study environmental issues, environmental politics, ecology and environmental writing. I participated in the program in the fall of 2010. It was possibly the coolest thing I’ve ever done.
Rachel shares her thoughts on activism, journalism, food, social justice, environmental issues, gender, sexuality and a few other things.
Showing posts with label SITW journal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SITW journal. Show all posts
10.08.2011
11.28.2010
End of the semester: this I believe
camp: Johnston Wilderness Campus
Well, it’s
the end of the semester and I feel compelled to wrap this up. There’s a lot I
didn’t cover, I guess, in terms of day-to-day experiences, but I feel like I
got most of the big idea s down. I have a long list of things to research and
learn more about, and I doubt I’ll ever get through the reading list that’s
been growing in my head all semester. Anyway, it seems appropriate to finish
off the semester with a few lists. So, here they are.
things I
believe:
Local
solutions to problems are time-consuming and sometimes messy, but they’re
probably the best way to solve a lot of environmental problems. For example,
the utility-scale solar clusterfuck.
Each
individual wolf has an intrinsic right to exist, but somehow, I have to be ok
with killing them anyway.
Similarly,
I don’t like forest management, but I’ve come to accept it as a necessary evil.
Or, in the case of Kendall and the aspen, a necessary good.
I like
ranchers, or at least Todd Nash, the Boises and Katie’s dad. I don’t mind
subsidizing them, but I don’t believe any corporation should be able to graze
on public lands.
I think
I’m ok with utility-scale solar, and that scares me, because fundamentally, I
don’t see how it’s different from a dam. And I thought I was opposed to dams.
Though NGS seems like a compelling case for giving them a second look, and what
kind of world do we live in that we have to make these choices in the first
place?
Questions
raised by big solar:
What do I
value? What am I willing to sacrifice?
What do we
destroy for PV?
How much
water, and where?
Will we
close coal plants, or just raise demand to meet capacity?
Do we care
about the desert tortoise?
How urgent
does climate change need to be before we sacrifice idealism?
Is my
solution going to be my child’s environmental problem?
Someone
needs to blow up Glen Canyon Dam. But really, I’m not sure I care about that
anymore either.
Knowing a
place—the way Craig does or the way Mary does—is a valuable skill.
Our
government will never solve climate change, but people like John Wick and Nils
Christofferson might.
I want the
last chapter of Dead Pool to come true.
I believe
everything I’ve written about NGS and the scale of our problem, but I still
hope we might learn jujitsu fast enough to make it count.
I’m torn
between two approaches to activism:
1) The
responsibility of an activist is not to navigate oppressive systems with as
much personal integrity as possible, it is to confront and dismantle those
systems.
2) What
matters most is how well you walk through the fire.
I know 1 is right, but 2 is so seductively beautiful.
I want to
fight. Even if it’s too late. Especially if it’s too late.
11.16.2010
Industrial solar in the desert
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: San Bernardino County, California
So
yesterday afternoon we went to the Sierra Club’s Desert Committee meeting which
was largely focused on renewable energy development on public lands. It’s a
very interesting political situation—the national Sierra Club supports
utility-scale solar in the Mojave, because climate change is a big enough
problem that they’re willing to sacrifice. The California Sierra Club is
opposed, and from what I saw at the meeting, a lot of their motivation is NIMBY
related, but not necessarily wrong. So much infighting amongst the
environmentalists there and so much anger in tone when addressing people on the
same side. Maggie’s sociology-related theory is that that generation grew up
wanting to stick it to the man and had to fight for recognition of
environmental issues. Our generation grew up knowing the system was fucked—we
didn’t have to realize it in college. We’re about dialogue and compromise, so
we listen. I think it has a lot to do with politics too. Republicans are a
right-wing party whose rhetoric is even further right (like Tea Party). Dems
are centrist and talk center-left sometimes, but they mostly backpedal and
capitulate. So no one’s even paying lip service to the far left, much less
enacting policies that they support. And that leads to frustration.
So
I don’t like their rhetoric, but I’m glad someone is fighting for the desert.
I’m glad someone will be watchdogging any large-scale solar and wind projects
that do get approved on public lands, because those corporations need to be
held accountable with the same level of scrutiny we would apply to any other
project. I worry about the precedent we set by allowing large utility companies
to develop projects on public lands. I think I’m willing to sacrifice the
desert tortoise for the greater good, but after talking to Jim Harvey this
morning, I’m not convinced it’s necessary. Feed-in tariffs seem to make sense,
though I really want a better knowledge of PV materials and manufacture before
I start getting excited about rooftop solar. The Solar Done Right guy I talked
to at the meeting said the Department of Energy was doing a cradle-to-grave
analysis of PV vs. concentrated solar. God, I want to see that, and apparently
they might not release it. Freedom of Information Act…
We
also talked to Jim Harvey this morning. He made a pretty compelling case for
doing feed-in tariffs and distributed generation rather than utility-scale
solar on public lands. I still want to look into PV and also his claim that
deserts sequester a ton of carbon and that benefit goes away with power
installation. I find it disheartening that none of these new power
facilities/installations—not the rooftop proliferation in Germany and not the
large projects proposed in the Mojave—have actually closed any coal plants. And
overall, I think environmentalists need to be more proactive about these sorts
of issues. I love Alex (Wilderness Society dude)’s acronyms—Nowhere on Planet
Earth (NOPE) and Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything (BANANA).
These are the new NIMBY, and we have to be more than that if we want to make
progress.
I
guess one of the things I’m wondering is if we accept that large utility-scale
projects hurt the desert and that solar rooftop is a better solution, what is
our best course, as activists and environmentalists? Do we acknowledge
political reality and recognize that climate change is urgent even while
feed-in tariffs are infeasible in a market dominated by big utilities? Or do we
stall large projects and right the system, fight for the desert? I’m tempted to
side with political reality, yet I know that if the project in question were
Glen Canyon Dam or a nuclear plant, I’d right to the bitter, bloody end to keep
it out of the desert. Maybe. Or would I? Maybe climate change is so serious
that radioactive waste, flooded canyons and decimated salmon runs are worth it.
Except we’re not closing any coal plants when we add all this solar and wind.
And while that’s discouraging in terms of ever stabilizing our climate or
having a future with pikas and Bangladesh, it does mean that we should do solar
right the first time, even if it takes longer.
A
feed-in tariff makes sense whether the utility scale stuff happens or not. So I
want to look into that, into getting an initiative started to get that going in
Washington. That seems like the perfect thing to bypass the state legislature
with and go straight to the people, yet Jim seemed confused and taken aback
when I suggested it. We’re not good at being proactive, which makes sense to an
extent, because a lot of people get into activism by opposing something close
to home, something where they never believed the corporation would take it that
far. We fight and oppose, but we have trouble being proactive and finding good
alternatives. We don’t recommend alternative sites, because everything is
sacred. We don’t try to pass initiatives that would pave the way to a brighter
future we imagine. We don’t go after coal plants. If Bill Gates shifted his
entire foundation and fortune towards repowering the US, it would be done. We
could close the coal plants and still guarantee all the employees their
salaries for the next five years. We don’t have that kind of money and we’re
used to seeing ourselves as underdogs with no real cards to play besides
emotional appeal. But we’re past that. This problem goes beyond a hippie
concern for trees and Gaia. So we need to use that lever and push for what we
want, not just against what we don’t. And I’m serious about that initiative.
You have to start somewhere.
11.13.2010
Trash
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
And
it’s late and I’m exhausted, so more catch-up tomorrow.
camp: San Bernardino County, California
First,
the stuff from today while it’s fresh in my mind. This morning, we went to the
community center in San Bernardino County, California, where they were
collecting hazardous waste and having a market where people bring random stuff
and sell it. I love the community interaction this fosters. I feel like so much
of the excitement of going shopping is just finding something new, something
you didn’t have before. And so much global resource consumption would be cut if
American did this kind of stuff more instead of just buying new crap. I want to
get involved in efforts like this—freecycling, dumpster diving, barter
economies, local currencies and grassroots flea market type things. I think
building these systems and methods of interaction is incredibly important and
has the potential to be so much fun. There’s so much adventure in going to an
open air market or digging through someone else’s trash, so much satisfaction when
you find something worth having. Kids love discovery. Just have to get them
when they’re young and they’ll be sold for life.
Hazardous
waste fascinates me. And makes me want to be a chem major. It’s so strange that
all medical waste is labeled a biohazard and disposed of by incinerating it.
Even HIV-infected blood is harmless after a few hours in the open air. Burning
plastics releases dioxin into the air, something much more pervasive and scary.
And yet, we can’t stick used dressings in the normal trash. God, I want to
design better plastics. Non-petroleum based substances that don’t contain BPA
or any other endocrine disruptors, that don’t release dioxin or any other
carcinogens, even when burned. I wonder how old the idea of hazardous waste is.
Even waste isn’t that old—maybe a century, one and a half at the most. I’m
impressed that they can recycle so much of it—I think he said 60-70%, including
the electronics. I need to learn more about semiconductor manufacturing.
11.03.2010
Building habitat for birds
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Roswell, New Mexico
Today,
we saw birds in a wildlife refuge, where ponds are filled and drained each year
to provide “natural” habitat for the migrating birds. I read the newsletter,
which talked about how so many people were viewing the birds from an unsafe
location on railroad tracks that the entire pond had to be closed for people’s
safety. This all reminds me of a zoo, except that the birds are free to come
and go. But it’s so controlled. So managed. So like Owens Lake. I wonder what
the history is, if this is one of the restoration “wetlands” mandated by
Congress as penance for bulldozing habitat to create another parking lot. Did
this used to be a real wetland, without the drainages and surrounding fields of
government-commissioned crops? And do we pay farmers to grow those crops
because they’re what the birds want to eat or because the crops are in surplus
and we’re trying to find as many uses as possible for them? I suppose I
could’ve asked Paul or someone at the visitor’s center instead of just assuming
that everything’s a conspiracy against nature and for farmers and agribusiness.
But that wouldn’t be any fun.
I
don’t mean to devalue the refuge for what it is—habitat for birds that need it.
I’m glad we have protected areas and places for those birds to eat and hang
out. Mike Prather understood the necessity of compromise better than anyone
else we’ve met, and if he can see the “construction site” that is Owens Lake as
a victory, then I can be grateful for man-made refuges. But it just seems to
god-like. Here is nature. Here is our highway, our railroad, our thriving
metropolis in the middle of the desert. So even as I accept that we grow
cancerously, that we’ve spread out enough to make setting these places aside a
necessity, I still wish it were otherwise.
11.02.2010
Election night
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: near Santa Fe, New Mexico
Election
night! And what a shitshow it is. Dems were down 42 house seats and 7
governorships when I went to bed. Murray will pull through, Joe Manchin got
West Virginia (!), Rand Paul in Kentucky (crazy shit), Blanche Lincoln is
getting her ass kicked and Tim Fucking Eyeman’s stupid anti-tax bullshit is
winning as we vote to repeal taxes on soda and candy, not give schools money
for energy efficiency and nor impose an income tax on people making more than
$200,000 a year. We’ll keep the Senate, the House is fucked, redistricting will
be a Republican wet dream and our government will continue to be center-right
and full of crazy people. I’m comforted by the knowledge that even if Democrats
controlled 535 seats in Congress and Obama was still in office, we wouldn’t be
doing shit about climate change anyway.
I
should mention Kendall* and aspen and climate change. How water is stored best
by aspen, how they’re in decline for a number of reasons, many of which go back
to climate change. How she said a lot of people in her forest don’t care about
or even accept climate change, but if you start talking water shortages, they
pay attention. I wish we could get people motivated about mitigation as easily
as adaptation. The climate is changing and people see it. Show them problems
and they’ll support solutions Ascribe causality to those problems and you’re a
communist trying to destroy the American economy. So even for mitigation, we
learn to be bilingual—green jobs, energy security, savings via conservation.
This is our Esperanto. Mention habitat, polar bears, ocean acidification or
taxing carbon and you become the enemy, hostile enough that the best response
is to shoot first. And so it goes—locally, people see things and can talk about
solving them, but nationally, James Infhoe will chair the House Committee on
Energy and Whateverthefuck once Dems lose. And so the long defeat marches
steadily on. Half the army has yet to see the cliff.
*Kendall
Clark, Supervisor for Carson National Forest, who we met with.
10.30.2010
Finding beauty in a broken world
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp:
with Bill deBuys, Northern New Mexico
Reading
Finding Beauty in a Broken World. My thoughts are far from the West, though
there are plenty of parallels to be drawn. How can people do this to other
people? How do we lose our connections and common ground? How do we fail to see
people as people? It’s Rwanda, Darfur, the Congo, apartheid, the Guatemalan
civil war, Pinochet, the death houses in Juarez, the conquering of a continent.
Where does it end? How do we see these things occurring and fall silent? How
can I possibly focus my energy and commitment as an activist, a writer, a
person? Trying to do anything but fix the planet and solve climate change is
criminal, because all of our futures are at stake. Seeing the human suffering
occurring in Congo or the girls sex-trafficked in India and choosing to care
about polar bears instead is equally criminal. But I can’t be everywhere. I
cry, wring my hands, call out in the night, beg a God I don’t believe in for
forgiveness. I don’t want to be complicit. I don’t want to stand silent while people
are tortured, animals are skinned while alive, habitats are bulldozed,
ecosystems are paved over.
I
find hope in the communities where people are starting to heal, to rebuild
themselves with dignity. I trust in people’s ability to nourish their own communities,
to find inner strength and courage even in the midst of unspeakable acts of
cruelty. I pray, knowing it won’t change a thing, and I write, still hoping
someday I’ll stumble across an answer, another small nugget of truth.
10.29.2010
The border
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: with Bill deBuys, Northern New Mexico
The border fascinates me. I am drawn to stories of migrants staking everything on their ability to walk invisibly through the desert and compelled by the way so many twisted realities intersect just south of the places I have grown up calling home. I feel moved to help individuals, and part of me wants to drive to Nogales and stuff my trunk full of as many willing bodies as I can find before passing through a checkpoint back home. I feel powerless to change policy—when so many sessions of Congress have still failed to pass the DREAM Act, what hope is there for an open border? I want to speak Spanish with the authority of a journalist who cares. I want these people to know that in my eyes and the eyes of so many others like me, they are not illegal. I say a prayer—that everyone walking ceaselessly through the desert makes it to the Promised Land safely.
camp: with Bill deBuys, Northern New Mexico
The border fascinates me. I am drawn to stories of migrants staking everything on their ability to walk invisibly through the desert and compelled by the way so many twisted realities intersect just south of the places I have grown up calling home. I feel moved to help individuals, and part of me wants to drive to Nogales and stuff my trunk full of as many willing bodies as I can find before passing through a checkpoint back home. I feel powerless to change policy—when so many sessions of Congress have still failed to pass the DREAM Act, what hope is there for an open border? I want to speak Spanish with the authority of a journalist who cares. I want these people to know that in my eyes and the eyes of so many others like me, they are not illegal. I say a prayer—that everyone walking ceaselessly through the desert makes it to the Promised Land safely.
10.28.2010
Climate nihilism
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: with Bill deBuys, Northern New Mexico
I
am the last generation to be born and raised on cheap energy with the promise
of a better life.
I
am the first generation slated to be poorer and die sooner than my parents.
I
drive past clear cuts, open pits of coal, landfills, smokestacks belching black
clouds into the air. I am seduced by the vision of industry, impressed by the
sheer magnitude of the changes we have made on this land. I don’t want a world
without city-sized industrial fortresses or Superfund sites, because then I
would have nothing left to fight.
I
know we’re past the point of saving the planet. I hope we’re past the point of
saving ourselves. I’ve always wanted to watch the apocalypse.
I
like the idea of fighting a losing battle. Winning is black and white, its
narrative a simple recollection of events. The story of losing requires nuance,
character, tragedy. I’ve always found the Trojans a more compelling people,
Hector a better hero than Achilles. Valor and heroism are determined not by how
many victories you win, but by how your defeat finally occurs.
I
find the world a more beautiful place with such clear imperfections. I like the
causes, but no the effects. I find smokestacks terrifyingly beautiful, but not
dissolving coral reefs. I see moral contradiction written on every landscape.
I
know industrial capitalism is killing the planet. I don’t want industrial
capitalism to go away because I want to see this awful comedy play out until
the bitter, bloody end.
I’m
tired of being sad and too numb to be angry. Some days, all I want is a house
with a garden and lot of books so I can come home to someone I love and put all
the frustration and passion and uncertainty I have into loving them, before we
make dinner together and ignore the fire raging all around us.
Choosing not to eat meat
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: with Bill deBuys, Northern New Mexico
I
read activists and revolutionaries who are determined to overthrow the system.
I see what they see—the scale of our destruction, the countless human and
non-human casualties—but I can’t imagine a better world wrought through
revolution. Maybe it’s history or my conviction that people are neither wholly
evil nor predisposed to do no harm. Maybe it’s the lack of a blueprint or
roadmap to that better world, or the rhetoric that seems so hostile towards
humanity telling me I should want to go there. I’m reluctant to deny personal
responsibility, although I know my choices won’t end sweatshops or factory
farming. It’s easier to blame the system and say I have no choice. But “the
system” is made of people too. At what point am I affirming my own powerlessness
by participating and at what point am I simply perpetuating injustices? If
eating factory farmed meat is ok because I didn’t build the infrastructure that
tacitly endorses torture, is it ok to work in a slaughterhouse? To manage the
kill floor? To oversee inspections for the USDA? To be a PR rep for Tyson? What
about board member, stockholder or CEO? The intricacies of industry make
determining the least destructive option difficult, to be sure. But once you
have, it becomes difficult to maintain the moral high ground that nothing I do
matters.
I
draw that line at agency, I suppose. It’s so clearly wrong to systematically
torture animals and so easy not to participate. Crops kill animals and so do
dams, but crops are needed to make meat, and nothing systematically tortures
animals quite like a factory farm. Saying I don’t want to eat that isn’t
enough—it won’t stop those farms from existing and it won’t meaningfully change
anything. But I still believe it matters. I’m not absolved of guilt or responsibility.
I eat things that are still killing the planet, if a bit more slowly. I can’t
articulate exactly why I feel so strongly about this, but I know absolutely
that I do. Some things matter, and how I choose to live my life is one of them.
I can’t change the world with that I eat for dinner, but I can help clarify my
own vision and start painting a path to the world I want to live in.
10.25.2010
Catholicism and revolution
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Taos Pueblo,
near Santa Fe, New Mexico
Something
about churches always gets me. I wasn’t raised religiously, so maybe it’s
because the event I most associate with churches is a funeral. I sat through
services for Nonny, Papa, Grandpa Jim, Grandma Mary and Grandpa Dan. And I feel
them whenever I’m back in a church. Especially Nonny. So much of my family
history goes back to her, and I’ll always regret not having more time to hear
those stories from her. Just the same way I’ll always regret not being old
enough to argue politics with Grandpa Jim wen he was still sane enough to do
it.
That
church on the Taos Pueblo was really cool, though. Catholicism is so similar to
pantheism in the way it’s practiced by some communities. Cultural fusion…I go
back and forth on Jesus. He was a radical, a social revolutionary and basically
a communist, yet that message has been lost in today’s world. Do the millions
of poor and enslaved who still follow him find hope in the prospect of a better
afterlife? Or do they pray for revolution in this one? Church can be a forum
for social issues, a lightning rod for activism. Or to can just be a way to
numb the pain. I love places that whisper revolution quietly, places that you
know would take to the streets if the opportunity presented itself. But I’m
still not sure about the church.
10.24.2010
The Navajo Nation
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: near Santa Fe, New Mexico
I
wish we’d gotten to talk to more Navajos while we were on the reservation.
Natural resources and social justice seem so applicable, as they are with any
resource rich and cash poor area. Extraction and exploitation go hand in hand
in the history book (excepting the newly revised Texas Curriculum Board ones)
and I wish we’d heard more about current issues and negotiations over water and
minerals. There was definitely a compelling undercurrent on the bulletin boards
I saw, and I know I’ve read thing about uranium mining on Navajo lands in the
Nation. I don’t know a lot about our tribes or reservations, but what I’ve read
seems like a very bleak picture. It’s not just Native Americans, I suppose—it’s
almost all impoverished communities with high unemployment sitting on valuable
resources. And poverty is greatest in resource-rich areas—what does that say
about the ruthlessness of capitalism? But to speak of sustainability seems like
a paradox. Conserve the oil or uranium and prevent a public health emergency and
the creation of two new Superfund sites? That’s ecologically sustainable, but
you’ll starve to death. Rich people destroy the plant far better and faster
than anyone, but up to a certain level, you can’t afford to card. You can’t
afford to think long-term. So you let the corporations in, they take what they
can, and you postpone starvation for a few decades. Not really economically
sustainable, but also not economic suicide. Someone needs to give these
communities a better option, or better yet, put them in a position to make
changes for themselves.
Which
seems like what Billy and the Shonto Community Development Corporation are
doing. Trying to get through the bureaucracy to serve the community, trying to
give people power. But to get rid of the coal plant, you need to create 600
jobs. Solar systems installation and monitoring are great, but there aren’t 600
jobs there. I hope the plant closes and a new one isn’t built. I hope we can
find a better way to employ Navajos, a better way to feed Los Angeles, a better
way to get power to Tucson. But as much as I hope, I don’t really believe.
10.23.2010
Walking through a coal plant
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Page, Arizona
context: This was written the day after we visited Navajo Generating
Station, which is the sixth largest coal plant in the country. I ended up
writing my final epiphany for the program about NGS. You can read it here and
see a video of me reading it here.
The
things we do and the scale we do them on completely defy comprehension.
Speaking about the environmental ethics of a coal plant seems like talking
about Hitler’s vegetarianism. This is ground zero for climate change; this is
where the battle will be fought and slowly lost. Does your ppm SO2
reading matter when the future of civilization it at stake?
But
it does. I know it does. Less acidic skies and rain and forests matter.
Community health matters. How many children get asthma matters. Those 545
full-time jobs matter for the Navajo. But it would still be cheaper to pay them
their salaries to not pollute. $52 million a year in payroll benefits seems
like a small price tag for one-quarter of Arizona’s emissions.
But
reality. Civilization. Seven billion and counting. Las Vegas needs water.
Phoenix needs water. Tucson needs water. And you need power to pump it there.
More people should live in Page, still more should live in Western Washington
or Vermont or never have been born at all. When does the planet and our collective
health start to matter? How far are we willing to go in our quest to postpone
our day of reckoning? The Second Coming seems easy by comparison. Jesus left us
a whole manual on how to live on earth. No one told us how to feed seven
billion people or raised cities in the middle of deserts.
10.21.2010
Desert Playground
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp:
Green River, Utah
Desert
Playground
looking
over the rim of a red rock canyon
trying
to walk quietly
pretending
to be 10,000 years old
stormy
skies threatening downpour
orange
water gathered in pools
the
slickrock transformed into a slide
funnels
down to mudflats
punctuated
by a thing line of four-toed tracks
coyote
ghosts
the
storm when it hits with nowhere to go
curl
on a rock ledge, hide from falling water
get
up to follow the rain traversing ground
clothes
are wet and loud
take
them off, walk barefoot through mud
feet
following this morning’s coyote
the
rain stops
stand
naked in the desert
and
the slickrock smooths your feet
10.18.2010
Letter to a human 10,000 years from now
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Back of Beyond, the Known Universe, Utah
Dear
person ten thousand years from now,
Today
it rained in the morning. The rocks around me are red-orange, made of sand
stuck together, forming ridges and shelves as far as I can see. Here, I walk on
my feet and sometimes my hands. The rain adds uncertainty to the land, so I
slide twenty feet down bare rock faces, not able to control my speed, barely
able to change direction. I almost fall into puddles of orange water pooled in
the rock. I walk up sandstone ledges arranged like a staircase, each step a
different width, half of them breaking off as soon as I put my weight on them.
I let the shape of the rock guide me, abandoning the concept of efficiency. I
want to move north, but the rock that way is too steep, and I risk falling,
sliding down into a canyon three hundred feet deep. Instead, I go west, finding
level ground, rocks that curve upward gradually, gentle enough to walk on.
I
wonder if you still go outside, if you see the sky with clouds and with sun. I
wonder if it still rains in the desert. I wonder if these canyons, sheer rock
faces plunging down hundreds of feet, are still here or anywhere. I wonder if
they’ve all been filled with trash or something radioactive, something with a
half-life greater than the time between my death and your birth.
I
hope you know what it is to be wet, to be cold, to feel so hot there’s sweat
dripping off of you back and you can barely stand to smell yourself. I hope
you’ve been hurt, feared for your life, known that one misstep might cause you
to fall into an abyss, hopelessly trying to fly on your way down. I hope you’ve
climbed on top of something and felt free to scream knowing no one can hear
you.
I
hope you’ve been alive, and been human.
love,
Rachel
Pretending to be old
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Back of Beyond, the Known Universe, Utah
context: Our writing assignment for the day was to pretend we were ten
thousand years old and wander around the canyonlands by ourselves.
I
find home. A cave, open to sky, to rock, to mountain lion. Closed to rain,
offset from wind. I see out, see everything. I am conspicuous, not curled
inside a canyon. I have to fight to stay here. I keep inside, keep watch. I
sleep. I eat. I wake.
Today,
the sun doesn’t penetrate through my skin, doesn’t burn me alive, doesn’t dry
me out until every pore in my body cries out for water. I am grateful for days
like today.
I
need to eat. There are deer tracks in all the washes, fresh, young. I know how
to catch mice. I know how to make the bitter juniper berries edible. I follow
tracks and trails in the sand. I can feed myself.
It
rains and I do not want to get wet. I shelter myself under a ledge and watch
the clouds move. I nestle my body between the rough sandstone and the soft
earth below it. I face down, look out, see the falling drops of water an inch past
the tip of my nose. It rains. I wait.
I
move. I walk and the drops hit me infrequently, seemingly willing to let me
through without a fight. I scramble up, careful to avoid slipping, deliberate
in all of my movements. I can’t fall. I am alone. If I hurt myself, I will lie
in the sand until I freeze to death or something finds me and eats me.
There
are so many ways to go inside here, so many places to wedge yourself into,
squeeze, squish, turn yourself into a rock and hide.
I
wonder what is over those mountains. I’ve heard stories from the bottoms of
canyons and the distant hills. I know where I am and my whole world looks like
this. I have never been over the mountains.
I
have too many clothes and they rustle. They make me visible, so I take them off.
Boots, rain jacket, socks, shirt, pants fall softly to the ground. I stand
naked and barefoot in wet sand and try to step quietly.
The
wet ground is sympathetic to bare feet. The soil gives way slowly without the
crunching that defines each bootstep on dry ground. I place my feet
deliberately, carefully, feeling the soil and rock beneath them. They do not
hurt. I am quieter. I feel the land like a rhythm, like a mantra as I walk,
climb, run. I can go anywhere.
10.17.2010
Tracking in the desert
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Back of Beyond, the Known Universe, Utah
In
the washes, there are sets of four-toed tracks compacting the dust, no longer
than a nickel, made sometime before the rain this morning.
I
feel the crunch of soil compacting under my show, step after step as I create a
new trail across the desert and I feel guilty for all the fun I’m having.
There
is a conversation taking place behind me, four people who used to be in my
shoes telling each other stories whose words I can’t make out.
Tracking
is a lot like journalism. You’re given pieces of information but left to piece
them together, decide what’s relevant, and decipher meaning. You start casting
a wide net, gathering as much data as you can. You write down anything you can,
ask as many questions as you can think of. You get close, get obsessed, caught
up in trying to find the story. You try angles, test theories, try to stay
unbiased. Not every government project is hiding a larger social problem. Not
every track with four toes and the perfect x above the metacarpal pad is a wolf
track. You learn from everything imaginable, and your biases guide what you
follow and where you choose to go. There are stories etched deep in every
landscape if you look hard enough.
Today,
following those coyote tracks, I found myself in a trance. It’s almost
meditative, the inquisitive silence punctuated by gasps as you look down to see
a print so clearly defined you could frame it and sell it as art. I got on all
fours, trying out gaits, trying to decipher what I was seeing. I know the
names—direct register walk, trot, lope—but I have so little practice picking
them out in the sand. I want to be a better student, spend more time drawing
and journaling and seeing everything the land has to teach me. But I like what
Craig said today—try so hard to pay attention and you miss things. All of our
minds wander. I’m no less holy or motivated because Ke$ha is stuck in my head,
because I’m spending half of my walk across the canyonlands worrying about
civil engineering. And those things that snap me out of my self-centered
thoughts, the things that slap me across the face and make me sit up and pay
attention—those are the things I want to learn about. And more of the than not,
they’re tracks.
10.16.2010
Walking through canyonlands
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Back of Beyond, the Known Universe, Utah
Sunrise
is hope, renewal spreading across the horizon. I wonder about the wisdom of
silence—we’re struck by awe, humbled at these sights. But maybe sounds can
acknowledge what we feel when we see the sun. It gives us life, sustains us,
feeds our bodies and nourishes our soul. Maybe we should dance, sing, be
joyous.
Feet
on dirt—crushing, compacting, like boots on snow. Feet on rock—a soft tap, not
quite a click. The same genus as heels on a marble floor, but a very different
species. Distant cousins. Water ripples in sand. Warm, not hot. A breeze so
small you can barely discern direction. Juniper berries and twigs pool in the
rock’s indentations. Pieces of crumbled rock are scattered on the slickrock.
Moon soil, full of craters. One piece looks like a tortoise, grotesque,
half-formed. It’s hotter. My abdomen tingles, my scalp itches. It’s an early
warning. Seek cover, get inside. The crypto is like a minefield and those hills
aren’t getting any closer.
I
love the ripples on the rock. Water is so clear in its presence and absence. It
carves over time, folding the surface in on itself, carving lines, curves,
stream channels. It’s the face of time, seemingly permanent until you walk
across it, and it cracks and crumbles, brittle sand, easier to change than the
wet tide flats at the beach.
10.15.2010
We can't solve climate change
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Back of Beyond, the Known Universe, Utah
context: We had just come from Aspen, Colorado, where the Auden
Schendler, who’s the VP of Sustainability for the Aspen Ski Company, told us
that we can’t possibly solve climate change and that we need to try as hard as
we can anyway.
Auden
Schendler is absolutely right, and I needed to hear what he said. Because we’re
absolutely going to fail. We can’t fix this problem in the time we need to.
We’re up against Exxon-Mobil, Citizens United vs. FEC, the competing attention
the recession is getting, a half-Republican Congress, CleanCoalTM
and the Tea Party. We’re going down in flames. And that’s exactly why we need
to fight. We have nothing to lose by trying. We have a moral imperative to try
as hard as we possibly can. We can slow our defeat or lessen its magnitude, but
it is coming. So we sigh, relieved—we know our destiny. It’s a march to the
gallows with heads held high, a fight to the death, and you can’t give up until
you’re lying face down in a pool of your own blood with seventeen bullets in
your back. Until then, we keep fighting. We fight with the urgency this problem
deserves, willing to push the envelope, willing to try anything to delay facing
death a little longer. We fight as long as there is breath in us. We fight.
10.10.2010
My food podcast
This entry is part of my journal from Semester in the West. For all SITW journal entries, click here. For all SITW posts, including blog posts I wrote while on the program, click here. To learn more about the program, click here.
camp: Paonia, Colorado
Time to think about food again. Maybe my next column and maybe my podcast will be about food, in all its permutations. Food justice—how we can get good, sustainable food to people making minimum wage or less. Sustainability—how we can feed ourselves in a way that doesn’t destroy the soil or warm the planet. Ironic that so many things in my life are pushing me in this direction and I don’t even know how to make a quesadilla. Ok, I do now. But that’s definitely a recent development. Food is so intimate, so political, so much a product of culture and upbringing and values. Food is community, the least threatening way to get people to talk to each other. Trying to bring ranchers and environmentalists together, we invite them to share a meal. After a storm, a long day in the cars or a wet day in the field, we gather together for a warm dinner, comforted by the conversation and the ability to feel nourished. But food nourishes us without nourishing the land. Agriculture is crazy. Beef isn’t any better. What do I say, in five minutes, about the topic that connects everyone in the world? I want to speak to poverty and the struggle to put food on the table at all, but there’s no solution to that problem. No one has a real answer when I pose the question, except Eric Porter, and I don’t want a world where poor people can only eat his beef. Someone needs to figure this out, but I can’t do that in a five minute podcast. If no one we’ve talked to can give me an answer, I risk making an audiobook of my last epiphany. What else can I say about food? Where’s the story I’m missing? Maybe it’s a tragedy or an unfinished quest. But that’s not the story I want to tell. Maybe it’s the wrong subject. Maybe I should stick to water. Or water politics. Nevada politics. But something always calls me back to food. I’m hungry. We’re all hungry, looking for a better world, a better way to eat. We need to free ourselves from corporate agriculture and American democracy. We need to remember how to take care of ourselves.
camp: Paonia, Colorado
Time to think about food again. Maybe my next column and maybe my podcast will be about food, in all its permutations. Food justice—how we can get good, sustainable food to people making minimum wage or less. Sustainability—how we can feed ourselves in a way that doesn’t destroy the soil or warm the planet. Ironic that so many things in my life are pushing me in this direction and I don’t even know how to make a quesadilla. Ok, I do now. But that’s definitely a recent development. Food is so intimate, so political, so much a product of culture and upbringing and values. Food is community, the least threatening way to get people to talk to each other. Trying to bring ranchers and environmentalists together, we invite them to share a meal. After a storm, a long day in the cars or a wet day in the field, we gather together for a warm dinner, comforted by the conversation and the ability to feel nourished. But food nourishes us without nourishing the land. Agriculture is crazy. Beef isn’t any better. What do I say, in five minutes, about the topic that connects everyone in the world? I want to speak to poverty and the struggle to put food on the table at all, but there’s no solution to that problem. No one has a real answer when I pose the question, except Eric Porter, and I don’t want a world where poor people can only eat his beef. Someone needs to figure this out, but I can’t do that in a five minute podcast. If no one we’ve talked to can give me an answer, I risk making an audiobook of my last epiphany. What else can I say about food? Where’s the story I’m missing? Maybe it’s a tragedy or an unfinished quest. But that’s not the story I want to tell. Maybe it’s the wrong subject. Maybe I should stick to water. Or water politics. Nevada politics. But something always calls me back to food. I’m hungry. We’re all hungry, looking for a better world, a better way to eat. We need to free ourselves from corporate agriculture and American democracy. We need to remember how to take care of ourselves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)