1) The absurd number of feminists, and people in general, who refuse to consider trans women to be women. The fact that the Michigan Womyn's Festival STILL has a "womyn born womyn" only entry policy. Having a vagina is not what makes you a woman. THIS IS NOT COMPLICATED.
2) White, cis feminists who refuse to acknowledge how disproportionately violence affects trans women and women of color. While I might be at higher risk for rape or domestic violence because of my gender, the likelihood that I will be on receiving end of violence goes way down because I'm white and cisgender. This is also true for pay gaps and just about every other feminist issue you can think of. Saying that is not in any way diminishing the seriousness of feminist concerns. It's just true. Feminism that isn't deliberately, consciously intersectional and self-critical at all times is BULLSHIT. Anyone who feels otherwise should do some serious self-reflection/just be a better person.
3) The fact that so many people conflate the two meanings of privilege and refuse to understand what people mean when they discuss privilege. "Privileged" can mean lucky in a single-instance sense, like when you feel privileged to be somebody's friend or privileged to be nominated for an award. Systematic, institutionalized privilege is a different thing, and it's a very real thing. I benefit from white privilege, as do all white people, regardless of their level of education, gender, income, sexuality, etc. I can walk down the street at night in a hoodie with a reasonable expectation that I won't be shot or harassed by the police. If I ever am a victim of violence or sexual assault, I have a reasonable expectation that the police will believe me and take my complaints seriously. The fact that I might be oppressed because of patriarchy doesn't make my white privilege any less of a thing. Bringing up the individual circumstances of your life that are less-than-optimal when someone is discussing systematic oppression is a form of derailing. Stop, listen, shut up. It's not that complicated.
4) The large number of people who are willing to get on their moral high horse about being vegan or vegetarian who are unwilling to a) get anywhere near as riled up about the horrible treatment of the PEOPLE in our food system, notably migrant farm workers or b) critically examine the way PETA's ads normalize violence against women and exoticize women of color. How do you care more about a cow being slaughtered than about people being held in slavery on Florida's tomato plantations? I do not mean metaphorical slavery or wage slavery, I mean literal, no-pay, threats-of-violence, held-against-their-will SLAVERY. I mean, I get the sympathy for cows and stuff. I'm not condoning factory farming, and I want to smash corporate industrial food systems and slaughterhouses. But seriously, people, PRIORITIES.
5) The border. Just seriously. Why is that even a thing? Why do we need a WALL to separate us from Mexico? And more to the point, all the people who say, "Well, they should just come here LEGALLY like MY (white) ANCESTORS DID." Like bro, seriously. It's a 20 year wait for a visa if you're a Mexican national with a close relative already living in the U.S. Twenty years. And also WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO JUDGE SOMEONE ELSE'S MOTIVATIONS FOR COMING TO THIS COUNTRY? Like, what gives you the right to go to like 90 countries with nothing more than a passport while we build a wall to keep the brown people out? Nothing. Don't say U.S. citizenship, because that is a social construction. There is nothing inherent in you as a person that makes you any more deserving. Nothing.
There are a lot more I could say, but those especially. If you're a friend who's unclear about any of these points, please ask me. I don't mind trying to help out with information; I do mind people who are wilfully ignorant.
Rachel shares her thoughts on activism, journalism, food, social justice, environmental issues, gender, sexuality and a few other things.
Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts
4.30.2012
4.05.2012
Coming out
This post has been a long time coming, but there’s something I’ve
finally decided I need to say.
I’m not straight.
I’ve known this for at least a few months, and probably really the
better part of a year, but I was afraid to say it. I was afraid because I wasn’t
positive, and I felt like declaring that you’re not straight isn’t something
you can take back. Heterosexuality is the default; as soon as you step outside the
safe realm of straightness, you can’t walk back across the line so easily.
And also, I was afraid because I felt like I hadn’t earned it. Many of
my LGBTQ friends went through long processes of self-discovery. Some spent years
trying to hide their identities or convince themselves that they weren’t “other.”
Most had to deal with dating people of the same gender in high school and were
subject to scrutiny from peers and parents. Many of them had supportive
families and friends, but there was still a level of self-awareness and
struggle that I didn’t feel I could compare to.
I’ve always dated guys, keeping my crushes on female friends under
wraps until after we’d all graduated from high school. Over the years, I’ve
fallen in love with women about as often as I’ve had a boyfriend, but something
about my desire seemed fundamentally different. There wasn’t anything sexual
about it; it was all about admiration and devotion. My crushes on women tapered
off as I got my first serious boyfriends in high school, and I laid the thought
of same-sex attraction to rest.
But after two years of long-distance college relationship, I found
myself single again. Faced with the prospect of dating and hooking up, I
started thinking vaguely about women again. I told myself that in the right
state of mind (slightly intoxicated, somewhat horny), I could see myself
hooking up with someone who wasn’t a guy. But this was all theoretical, until I
actually tried it a few months ago. And I liked it. A lot.
Since then, I’ve opened myself up to the idea of desiring women, of not
discriminating based on gender when I’m attracted to someone. And lo and
behold, that voice in the back of my head telling me to reconsider has only
gotten stronger.
Still, I didn’t want to label myself. How could I say I was queer when
I hadn’t actually slept with or dated anyone who wasn’t male? On the other
hand, denying this part of myself seemed like lying, not to mention furthering
the invisibility of the substantial non-straight contingent of people in the
world. I lamented this to my friends, many of whom are LGBTQ. After agonizing
over my options for a few minutes, one of my best friends, who’s also gay, interrupted
me.
“Rachel, our tent is small enough as it is. You’re an awesome person,
and we’d love to have the company.”
I began to speak openly about my experiences with women. Because I go
to a liberal arts college in Washington State, no one really batted an eye. I
thought about coming out, but it seemed contrived. I wasn’t sure how to label
myself—bisexual reinforces the idea of a gender binary, and queer seemed
inaccurate given my limited experience. It’s the closest thing I have, but I
ultimately decided that even coming out as “not-straight” was worth doing. So
here we are.
I have benefitted from and will continue to benefit from straight
privilege. Most of the relationships in my life will likely be with men,
because I’m more on that side of the spectrum and because it’s what I’m used
to. I have the option of folding myself back into the niche that society wants
to carve out for me, and to do so wouldn’t be impossibly difficult. I could
forget about this whole queer thing.
But I don’t want to. I know many LGBTQ activists have staked claims on
the fact that their sexuality wasn’t a choice, and that science has suggested
some portion of our orientations might be coded in our genes. I’m declaring the
opposite. I’m choosing to be this way, because it makes me happy. I don’t know
where I’ll end up, what experiences the world has in store for me. But I know
that I’ll live better for keeping that door open.
10.17.2011
The gay conversation
My host brother, Nico, had one of his friends over last week (they play
in a band together), and I was chatting with them about music. My brother’s
friend studied in the US for a while and has a gringa girlfriend, so his
English is even better than Nico’s (he’s more or less fluent, but you can tell
English isn’t his first language). He always wants to speak English with me, so
we usually talk in a mixture of the two languages. The boys were discussing
songs for their band, and Nico mentioned loving some song by John Mayer. His
friend agreed, and I shook my head.
“What?” the friend asked me.
“Nothing, he’s just an asshole and a womanizer,” I responded. We
discussed this for a little while—they wanted to know how I knew this (“Have
reasons, Rachel,” said Nico). I said I saw stuff about him on supermarket
tabloid covers. Eventually, we agreed that his music was one thing, but as a
person, he was probably an asshole.
And then Nico’s friend says, “Well, at least he’s not gay.”
Quito as a city looks pretty developed. The more rural areas of Ecuador
seem more classically “third world”, but Quito might as well be a major city in
the US, at least in many regards. So sometimes I forget how different cultures
can be here. But this is one of the most striking differences between the US
and the Third World that I’ve noticed. Say what you will about the US’s
policies towards gay people, but at least among our urban, well-educated
population, being gay has become almost completely normal. Not to say that
there isn’t discrimination, but being gay is not the awful, secret thing it was
fifty years ago. A friend coming out to me wouldn’t elicit anything more than, “Oh,
ok, cool.” I’ve almost gotten to the point where I stop assuming gender when
someone mentions having a significant other.
So here I am, radical feminist/ally Rachel, sitting across the table
from two nice, well-educated guys who happen to believe that about half of my
friends are disgusting. Cultural sensitivity is one thing, but I wasn’t letting
that one slide.
“What does that mean?” I asked. Nico’s friend said something I don’t
remember about gay people being gross. I said, “You know, like half of my
friends at school are gay.”
He countered with, “That’s ok because you’re a girl, though. It’s not
weird if they’re lesbian.”
This sentiment, that somehow lesbians are ok, or aren’t really gay, is
something I also noticed in Ghana. While I was there, homosexuality was causing
quite the controversy in the local papers (this all started when the main
government-owned daily paper ran as a front page headline: 8000 HOMOS FOUND IN
TWO REGIONS. The deck was, “majority infected with HIV/AIDS”. The actual story
was that the UN AIDS program was trying to get people to come forward and get
tested for HIV as a public health measure, and some of them happened to be gay.)
So the whole time I was there, there were opinion columns and articles debating
the ethics of tolerating homosexuals, one of which defined bisexuality as “when
someone is married but maintains sexual relations with the same sex.” And yet
invariably, every single article would spend paragraphs bashing gay people and
then say something to the effect of, “Lesbians are totally cool, though.” I
think it’s a pretty common attitude in general. For people threatened by
gay-ness, lesbians are much safer. First of all, girls don’t have sex (because
we’re all proper and don’t have any libido and are just waiting to be seduced
by nice guys). So if someone says they’re lesbian, no one pictures two girls
going at it. Also, lesbians come with the possibility of girls making out with each other! Which many straight guys seem to
think is the most exciting thing in the world.
Anyway, back in Ecuador, I was shaking my head and trying to figure out
what I could say to these guys. I said, “No, they’re not all lesbian, I have
guy friends who are gay too.”
And then, Nico’s friend says, “Oh, that’s scary though…” He motions
cutting himself and blood dripping, and says, “…and then you’ll get HIV.”
At that point, I just got mad. I said, no, that’s absurd, most gay
people do not have HIV. He said, yes they do, because they all have anal sex. I
said that not all gay people have anal sex, and anyway, that’s why condoms were
invented. He said, no, condoms were invented for guys and girls to use, not for
gay people. Clearly, I was not getting anywhere here.
And so he kept talking with Nico, and I thought about straight
privilege. It hurts me to hear people talk this way about people I know and
love. Two of my best friends from high school are gay. Another one is trans. My
roommate freshman year was queer. About half of my friends at Whitman are not
straight in some capacity. And yet, as a straight person, I can travel to
countries where the prevailing attitude towards gayness is one of disgust and judgment,
and I can feel safe. My relationships will never be questioned. I am normal. I
fit the mold.
As I’m sitting here, thinking, he asks me what I’m thinking about. I
shook my head, not sure how to explain. He says, “You’re thinking about them
having sex, aren’t you?” I said no, I was thinking about all the people I know
and care about who happen to be gay, but also happen to be people with
characteristics other than their sexuality. He laughed and said, “But now you’re
thinking about sex.” I said yes, since he brought it up. He said it would just
be weird to have gay friends, because they might start liking you. I said, so
what, I’ve had guy friends who liked me when I didn’t feel the same way, and it’s
weird, but it wouldn’t be any weirder if
it was a girl. He shook his head and employed the standard Latino guy defense. “It’s
just because we have a machista culture”, he said. That’s why we’re not ok with
the gays.
Machista culture is obviously something I have a hard time with. It’s
employed during orientation to tell women that we shouldn’t drink much and need
to be extra careful (not that this isn’t true, but I would rather live in a
world where we educate men not to rape women, rather than educating women about
how not to get raped). It’s the excuse given for the men who whistle at you on
the bus and creep on you when you’re walking home. It’s the go-to explanation
for behavior that I would label as obsessive, bordering on stalking, when
dealing with men my age in Latin America. I’m
just worried about you. That’s why I’ve texted you every ten minutes for the
past two hours to ask you why you weren’t responding to my first message. It’s
probably the reason that when I left the club I was at on Friday night at 2am,
a random strange man asked me where I was going, and when I said home, he asked
if he could come with me and got offended when I said absolutely not. I can get
on board with cultural sensitivity when it’s about the fact that Ecuadorians
will tell you a time for something and mean an hour later. Or when it’s about
the fact that food=love, so you have to finish everything on your plate lest
you gravely offend your host mom. But the machista thing, I don’t buy. Cultural
differences are great, but some things need to evolve. Sexism is one of them.
Homophobia is another.
And yet, during this conversation with Nico and his friend, I asked
them if homosexuality was illegal here. Both of them said no, absolutely not.
How could that even be illegal, they asked? I said that gay sex had been
illegal in many states in the US until 2003, that it was absolutely illegal in
many other countries, especially in Africa, and that in Uganda, it was
punishable by death. They looked at me incredulously and said no, we don’t do
that here. And both of them seemed to think that the notion of making anyone’s
sexual orientation illegal was absurd. I suppose that’s progress of a kind. And
given how far the US has come on LGBT issues in the past fifty years, I’m
optimistic that the rest of the world will soon follow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)